M
M
e
e
n
n
u
u
M
M
e
e
n
n
u
u
M
M
e
e
n
n
u
u

Case Study

Case Study

Case Study

OS:Warszawa

The most important discoveries happen not when we arrive somewhere, but when we realise we've been somewhere all along. Warsaw revisited through infrastructure metaphor.

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Year:

2026

Residency

Warszawa

Residency

Warszawa

Residency

Warszawa

Protocol

Data Recirculation

Protocol

Data Recirculation

Protocol

Data Recirculation

Second Installation

Second Installation

Second Installation

Returning to Warsaw after Belgrade will mean installing myself into a system I've already run before. Not a fresh boot-up but a reinstallation - discovering what code still works, what needs updating, what's been deprecated. The second residency will investigate what changes when you return to a city you've already documented.OS:Warszawa will ask: does the city run the same code, or has it compiled a new version? Do it's existing protocols still execute? When you know the system already, what becomes visible that you missed during initial installation? The operating system metaphor proves most useful here - I will not be merely rediscovering Warsaw, I'll be checking for updates.

Returning to Warsaw after Belgrade will mean installing myself into a system I've already run before. Not a fresh boot-up but a reinstallation - discovering what code still works, what needs updating, what's been deprecated. The second residency will investigate what changes when you return to a city you've already documented.OS:Warszawa will ask: does the city run the same code, or has it compiled a new version? Do it's existing protocols still execute? When you know the system already, what becomes visible that you missed during initial installation? The operating system metaphor proves most useful here - I will not be merely rediscovering Warsaw, I'll be checking for updates.

The most important discoveries happen not when we arrive somewhere, but when we realise we've been somewhere all along. First arrival is installation. Return is recognition of version changes - both in the city's code and your own. What worked in 2025 might not work in 2026. Protocols need patching. Dependencies may have changed. This investigation will document the return process itself as methodology. How do you observe a city you've already systematically documented? What's left to investigate when you've walked the zones? Answer: you're no longer documenting the city - you're documenting your own integration process as it runs a second time with different parameters.

Kilometres Walked

00 +/-

Kilometres Walked

00 +/-

Kilometres Walked

00 +/-

Data Streams

00

Data Streams

00

Data Streams

00

Image Captures

00

Image Captures

00

Image Captures

00

System Memory

System Memory

System Memory

Cities have memory encoded in infrastructure. Streets remember their names even when their purpose changes. Buildings hold functions that have long since migrated elsewhere. The transit system carries routing decisions from decades past. When you return to a city, you're comparing your memory against the system's memory - two different storage methods, two different retention patterns.OS:Warszawa documents this comparison process. Your memory says this neighbourhood was X. The current infrastructure says it's now Y. Which version is more accurate? Answer: both. Your memory captured a specific build. The city has released updates. Neither is the "true" Warsaw - they're different commits in the version history.

Cities have memory encoded in infrastructure. Streets remember their names even when their purpose changes. Buildings hold functions that have long since migrated elsewhere. The transit system carries routing decisions from decades past. When you return to a city, you're comparing your memory against the system's memory - two different storage methods, two different retention patterns.OS:Warszawa documents this comparison process. Your memory says this neighbourhood was X. The current infrastructure says it's now Y. Which version is more accurate? Answer: both. Your memory captured a specific build. The city has released updates. Neither is the "true" Warsaw - they're different commits in the version history.

The operating system metaphor clarifies what return actually means. You're not nostalgically revisiting a place you loved. You're running a regression test - checking whether your existing code still works in the current environment. Sometimes it does. Sometimes it breaks in interesting ways. Sometimes the city's updates break backward compatibility with your own protocols. This investigation will make explicit what happens during any return visit: reconciling cached assumptions with current reality. The second residency methodology turns this reconciliation process into systematic documentation rather than vague sentiment about how places "change" or "stay the same."

Running Known Code

Running Known Code

Running Known Code

The advantage of returning: I have existing protocols to test against current conditions. That coffee shop routine I developed in 2025 - does it still execute? Those navigation shortcuts - do they still work? The transit patterns I learned - have they been updated? I will not be learning the city fresh. YI'll be debugging my existing codebase.This reveals what has actually changed versus what I remember differently. Memory is unreliable storage. Documentation is the commit history I can check against. When something feels different, Ican verify: did the city change, or did I? The return residency makes the comparison possible because you logged the first installation.

The advantage of returning: I have existing protocols to test against current conditions. That coffee shop routine I developed in 2025 - does it still execute? Those navigation shortcuts - do they still work? The transit patterns I learned - have they been updated? I will not be learning the city fresh. YI'll be debugging my existing codebase.This reveals what has actually changed versus what I remember differently. Memory is unreliable storage. Documentation is the commit history I can check against. When something feels different, Ican verify: did the city change, or did I? The return residency makes the comparison possible because you logged the first installation.

Known code running in familiar environment should be boring. That's the point. When it's not boring - when the routine fails, when the protocol throws an error, when the familiar path produces unexpected results - that's where the investigation focuses. Changes in city infrastructure. Updates to my own operating assumptions. Conflicts between ymy cached version and current reality. The second Warsaw residency isn't about discovering new zones or finding hidden neighbourhoods. It's about understanding what changes and what remains constant when you run the same investigative code twice. Some processes are stable. Some have been patched. Some no longer compile at all.

Regression Testing

Regression Testing

Regression Testing

Warsaw will run different code in 2026 than it did in 2025. So will I. The second residency won't simply be about rediscovery - it's regression testing my protocols against am updated infrastructure.

Warsaw will run different code in 2026 than it did in 2025. So will I. The second residency won't simply be about rediscovery - it's regression testing my protocols against am updated infrastructure.

Warsaw will run different code in 2026 than it did in 2025. So will I. The second residency won't simply be about rediscovery - it's regression testing my protocols against am updated infrastructure.

David H.

WWTC Founder

David H.

WWTC Founder

David H.

WWTC Founder

More projects

More projects

More projects

Reticulate

Take a trip over to Reticulate to see more of my creative work

David Henzell

WWTC FOUNDER

Reticulate

Take a trip over to Reticulate to see more of my creative work

David Henzell

WWTC FOUNDER

Reticulate

Take a trip over to Reticulate to see more of my creative work

David Henzell

WWTC FOUNDER

13

initiation protocol

establish contact

Questions about WWTC methodology? Want to discuss urban investigation? Interested in collaboration? Reach out.

By submitting, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

WWTC IS Based in WARSAW BELGRADE
& BEYOND

Soft abstract gradient with white light transitioning into purple, blue, and orange hues

13

initiation protocol

establish contact

Questions about WWTC methodology? Want to discuss urban investigation? Interested in collaboration? Reach out.

By submitting, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

WWTC IS Based in WARSAW BELGRADE
& BEYOND

Soft abstract gradient with white light transitioning into purple, blue, and orange hues

13

initiation protocol

establish contact

Questions about WWTC methodology? Want to discuss urban investigation? Interested in collaboration? Reach out.

By submitting, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

WWTC IS Based in WARSAW BELGRADE
& BEYOND

Soft abstract gradient with white light transitioning into purple, blue, and orange hues

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.